Express Search June 2010 Newsletter Citation Listing

2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement
  1. Office of the President of the United States, “2010 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement,” June 2010. (Intellectualproperty Strategic Plan.pdf)
  2. Joe Mullin, “ITC Survey: Casting a Wider Net” July 2010 Corporate Counsel pp. 68-71.
  3. IPEC Homepage (http://www.whitehouse.gov).
  4. Mullin, “ITC Survey.”
An Introduction to ITC Section 337 Filings: The Basics of Why and How
by Ryan Ward
  1. 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1); see also United States Trade Commission, located at http://www.usitc.gov/index.htm (last visited May 14, 2010).
  2. 17 C.F.R. § 210.71.
  3. 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B).
  4. Robert G. Krupka et al., Section 337 and the GATT: The Problem or the Solution?, 42 Am. U. L. Rev. 779, 787 (1993).
  5. 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B)(ii).
  6. Thomas J. Prusa, An Economic History and Analysis of Section 337, Fig. 3, Jan. 16, 1990, 02 history 337.pdf.
  7. G. Brian Busey & John Kolakowski, ITC Section 337 Case Filings on Pace to Set Record, Morrison Foerster, June 7, 2006, located at http://www.mofo.com (last visited May 14, 2010) (see the chart associated with the article for the actual number of cases investigated throughout the early 2000s).
  8. Tom Fisher, ITC law blog, Oblon Spivak, located at http://www.itcblog.com (last visited May 14, 2010).
  9. USITC – Investigations under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, located at http://www.usitc.gov (last visited May 14, 2010).
  10. Shayerah Ilias, Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Enforcement: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, CRS Report for Congress CRS-2, May 16, 2008, Intellectual Property Rights Protection - Enforcement.pdf.
  11. 17 C.F.R. § 210.10(a).
  12. 17 C.F.R. § 210.13(a).
  13. 17 C.F.R. § 210.13(a).
  14. Shayerah Ilias, Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Enforcement: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, CRS Report for Congress Table 1, May 16, 2008, Intellectual Property Rights Protection - Enforcement.pdf.
  15. See Michael A. Ritscher et al., The Status of Dual Path Litigation in the ITC and the Courts: Issues of Jurisdiction, Res Judicata and Appellate Review, 18 AIPLA Q. J. 155, 157 (1990).
  16. Robert G. Krupka et al., Section 337 and the GATT: The Problem or the Solution?, 42 Am. U. L. Rev. 779, 807-808 (1993).
  17. Shayerah Ilias, Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Enforcement: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, CRS Report for Congress CRS-2, May 16, 2008, Intellectual Property Rights Protection - Enforcement.pdf.
  18. Id.
  19. Robert W. Hahn & Hal J. Singer, Assessing Bias in Patent Infringement Cases: A Review of International Trade Commission Decisions, 21 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 457, 461-462 (2008)
  20. Robert W. Hahn & Hal J. Singer, Assessing Bias in Patent Infringement Cases: A Review of International Trade Commission Decisions, 21 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 457, 461 (2008)
  21. Shayerah Ilias, Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Enforcement: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, CRS Report for Congress CRS-3, May 16, 2008, Intellectual Property Rights Protection - Enforcement.pdf.
  22. 17 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(9).
  23. 17 C.F.R. § 210.13(a).
  24. 17 C.F.R. § 210.13(b)(3).
EU IP Talks with India, Central America
by Sevana Sammis
  1. Tido von Schoen-Angerer, director of Doctors without Borders campaign on access to medicine.
  2. Cronin, David. “New Parliament Group Monitors EU Trade Pacts' Impact on Poor's Medicines.” Intellectual Property Watch, January 28, 2010.
  3. Cronin, David. “Risk of Wrongful Medicines Seizures Seen in EU-Central America Trade Deal.” Intellectual Property Watch, April 5, 2010.
Patent Reform Status
by Sevana Sammis
  1. Patrick Leahy Senator Page – Press Release “Leahy, Sessions, Hatch, Schumer, Kyl, Kaufman Unveil details of Patent Reform Agreement.” 4 March 2010.
  2. Ibid.
  3. Ibid.
  4. Senator Patrick Leahy “Patent Reform: Good for Innovation” POLITICO. 22 March 2010.
  5. HR5322 Patent and Trademark Office Funding and Stabilization Act (http://www.opencongress.org).
  6. 2010 Patent Law Reform Update (http://www.fr.com).
The Economics of Biological Material, An Historic Primer
(Book Review by Rachel Gordon).
  1. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot (Crown Publishers, 2010, New York).
WTO Rulings: External Influence on IP Industry Business
by Sevana Sammis
  1. Paranagua, Pedro. “The US-Cotton Case: The Truth Behind Brazil's Cross Retaliation Against US Intellectual Property.” March 18, 2010.
  2. Schnepf, Randy. “Brazil's WTO Case Against the US Cotton Program.” May 6, 2010 (http://latin-americas.blogspot.com)
  3. Ibid., Schnepf.
  4. Mara, Kaitlin. “China Tells WTO: Obligations Fulfilled on IP Dispute Case.” Intellectual Property Watch, March 22, 2010.
WTO, The Doha Round, and IP: Nearing the Decade Mark
by Sevana Sammis
  1. New William, and Mara, Kaitlin Mara. “New WIPO Development Agenda Group Seeks Transformation of UN Agency .” Intellectual Property Watch, April 26, 2010.
  2. Esalimba, Robinson. “Special Report: IP Protection Secondary To Support for Small African Innovators.” Intellectual Property Watch, November 19, 2009.
  3. BBC News, “Mixed Reactions to G20 Outcome.” April 2, 2009. (http://news.bbc.co.uk)
  4. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde and Jeffrey J. Schott, Matthew Adler, Claire Brunel, and woan Foong Wong, “Figuring Out the Doha Round.” (Dialogue Paper Schott E.pdf)
  5. New and Mara, 2010.
  6. Palmer, Doug, “WTO Doha round deal unlikely in 2010.” January 14, 2010. (http://sify.com).